In an unexpected move that has raised eyebrows across Kenya, the government announced on Wednesday, 01 November 2023, a new tax on citizens who spend more than three minutes in the toilet for a long call and more than 30 seconds for a short call. While taxation is a common tool used by governments to fund essential services, this peculiar levy has sparked debates and controversies. 

The Kenyan government has cited a couple of reasons for the introduction of this unusual tax. First and foremost, they argue that excessive time spent in the toilet can lead to long queues and inconvenience for others in public facilities, particularly during peak hours. By imposing a tax, they hope to discourage people from lingering in restrooms and, consequently, improve overall efficiency and cleanliness in these spaces.

Secondly, the government contends that this tax serves as a measure to promote environmental awareness. The idea is that shorter toilet visits would reduce water consumption and help conserve resources in a country that often faces water scarcity issues. This reasoning is aligned with a broader global trend towards sustainable practices and conservation.

Since the announcement of this tax, it has generated a considerable amount of controversy and outrage among the Kenyan public. Critics argue that it is an intrusion into personal privacy and an overreach of government authority. Some see it as a violation of basic human rights, including the right to access sanitation facilities without feeling rushed or monitored.

Additionally, there are concerns about the practicality of enforcing such a tax. How will the authorities determine the exact duration of a person's bathroom visit? Will there be monitors or timers in public restrooms, and will there be penalties for non-compliance? These questions have raised doubts about the feasibility of implementing and managing the tax effectively.

Furthermore, the tax has sparked debate about its potential impact on vulnerable groups. Some argue that it could disproportionately affect individuals with health conditions that require extended time in the bathroom, such as pregnant women, the elderly, or those with gastrointestinal disorders. Others worry that the tax may deter people from using public facilities altogether, potentially leading to unhygienic and unsanitary practices.

While the controversy surrounding this tax is ongoing, it remains to be seen whether it will be effectively implemented and enforced. There is a likelihood that the government may reconsider or modify the tax in response to the public backlash.

In the meantime, it is essential for the government to engage in open and transparent discussions with the public and relevant stakeholders to address concerns and find a balanced solution that promotes both efficiency and environmental responsibility without infringing on individual rights.

Kenya's new toilet tax, targeting the duration of restroom visits, has stirred up significant controversy and raised questions about its practicality and fairness. While the government's intent to promote efficient restroom usage and environmental awareness is commendable, the tax's impact on individual privacy and vulnerable groups should not be ignored. As this debate continues, it is crucial for the government to consider public feedback and strike a balance between its objectives and the rights and needs of its citizens.